| . |
prior
to activation of the immune system (acute inflammation). If infection
or injury is more
extensive,
however, or if the affected individual is chronically ill and unable to
produce a sufficient
acute
response to the eliciting stimulus, the immune system will become activated
thus resulting
in
a chronic inflammatory state. Chronic inflammatory processes can
in turn initiate a non-specific
systemic
acute phase response (APR) which involves alterations in release of acute
phase
proteins
(APP) from the liver that promote further systemic and metabolic changes
in response
to
inflammation.
Two
phases of inflammation have been identified. The initial phase is
the inflammatory phase,
which
involves (a) destruction or sequestration of the invading pathogenic agent
and (b) removal of
necrotic
cells and debris. The subsequent phase is the reparative phase which
incorporates
aspects
of wound healing. If repair is successful, the affected tissue will
be returned to its original
state
and function. In cases of extensive or prolonged inflammation, the
affected tissue is replaced
by
fibrotic scar tissue.
Measurement
Prominent
measures of inflammation include quantitative assessment of the pro-inflammatory
cytokines
interleukin-1 (IL-1 ),
interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-
(TNF- ), the anti-inflammatory
cytokines interleukin-4 (IL-4) and interleukin-10 (IL-10)
(see
http://pmbcii.psy.cmu.edu/core_e/cytokines.html),
and total or specific white blood cell
counts
(see http://pmbcii.psy.cmu.edu/core_e/common_immune_assays.html).
Other measures
of
inflammation include detection and quantification of APPs, cellular adhesion
molecules,
chemokines,
and markers of allergic inflammatory response (e.g., protein products of
inflammatory
cells).
Table 1 below lists a number of commonly measured biomarkers of inflammation,
their
availability
in biological samples, and frequently used assays.
Table
1 provides neither an exhaustive catalogue of all available measures of
inflammation, nor
recommendations
for which measures to employ. Rather, it provides an overview of
the types of
measures
commonly used in research.
Table
1. Biomarkers of inflammation

ELISA
= enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay; FIA = Fluorescence Immunoassay;
hs-CRP
ELISA = high sensitivity CRP enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay;
IN
= immunonephelometry; IL = immunoluminometry; IT = immunoturbidimetry
Physiological
Mechanisms
Infection
or injury to tissue stimulates recruitment of mast cells to the affected
site. Mast cells
secrete
pro-inflammatory factors (e.g., histamine) which act on local blood vessels
to increase
delivery
of blood, plasma and additional inflammatory cells to the site. Included
among the
inflammatory
cells are neutrophils and macrophages which kill and ingest invading pathogens.
Prolonged
inflammation stimulates macrophage secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines.
Cytokines
promote further inflammatory activity by increasing the number of leukocyte
adhesion
molecules
on endothelial cells proximal to the affected site. This enhanced
expression of
adhesion
molecules results in local accumulation of cells of the immune system such
as
CD4+
T and B lymphocytes, as well as additional monocyte-derived macrophages.
In the
case
of chronic infection, pro-inflammatory cytokines released from lymphocytes
(e.g.,
IL-1 , IL-6, TNF- )
can enter the systemic circulation and ultimately elicit a hepatic APR.
In
the case of allergic inflammation, initial activation of resident mast
cells is stimulated by a
mechanism
involving immunoglobulin E (IgE) rather than pathogenic tissue insult.
Activated
mast
cells respond to the allergic stimulus by releasing factors (e.g., TNF- ,
GM-CSF) that
recruit
and activate eosinophils. Eosinophils, in turn, produce factors that
can promote survival
and
further activation of mast cells, thus contributing to a forward-feeding
process of prolonging
and
intensifying allergic response.
Recommended Reading
Adamko,
D., Lacy, P., & Moqbel, R. (2004). Eosinophil function in allergic
inflammation:
From
bone marrow to tissue response. Current Allergy and Asthma Reports,
4, 149-158.
Rabin,
B.S. (1999). Overview of the Function of the Immune System. In B.S. Rabin,
Stress,
immune function, and health: The connection. New York, NY: Wiley-Liss.
Roberts,
W.L., Moulton, L., Law, T.C., Farrow, G., Cooper-Anderson, M., Savory,
J., & Rifai,
N.
(2001). Evaluation of nine automated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein
methods:
Implications
for clinical and epidemiological applications. Part 2. Clinical Chemistry,
47(3),
418-425.
Silkoff,
P.E. (2000). Noninvasive measurement of airway inflammation using exhaled
nitric
oxide
and induced sputum. Current status and future use. Clinics in Chest
Medicine,
21(2),
345-360.
Vig,
R.S., Forsythe, P., & Vliagoftis, H. (2006). The role of stress in
asthma. Insight from
studies
on the effect of acute and chronic stressors in models of airway inflammation.
Annals
of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1088, 65-77.
Core-E
Main Biological
Measures Used
|